| CLICK HERE IF YOU ARE STUCK IN SOMEONE'S FRAMES |
| HOME PAGE | SITE MAP | COMMENTS | HOT LINKS | FAVORITE LINKS | OUTDOORS | SURVIVAL |
| AWARDS | E=MAIL ME | BELIEFS | HOLIDAY PAGES | WEB RINGS | UTILITIES | GUEST BOOK |
Problem with wind-resistant synthetic outer layers (save the most expen- sive, such as Gore-Tex) is that if they keep moisture out, then they'll keep it _in_, too. So prespiration, wicked away from the skin by the polypro/wool inner layers, cannot escape. At the outer layer, where it's coldest, that moisture comes close to freezing (if it doesn't in fact), and (either way) progressively blocks subsequent perspiration from escaping. Result: Damp clear through. If one cannot afford the $80-400 per garment for Gore-Tex, next best is to go with a blend of synthetics and natural fibers that'll cut the wind and let moisture pass in both directions. I prefer %60-synthetic- to-%40-natural blend, but %65-%35 has proponents. If one is properly layered, it's perfectly feasable to be comfy while the outer surface is at or below freezing. Vapor pressure will force perspiration to the outer surface of the outer garment, where it freezes and can be brushed off. Snow from the outside won't melt, and it too can (and _must_) be brushed away. When this is so, it doesn't really matter _what_ the materail is, so long as snow doesn't adhere when brushed, and moisture passes through. I have been perfectly happy in outer shells of %50-%50.
The problem with ski-pants is that they are cut fashionably tight, where- as baggy is warmer. Again, treated "wetlock" fabrics popular for insulated skiing overpants won't let moisture escape. I go with $35 army surplus baggy wool pants, and wear home-made %65-%35 overpants (straight cut leg, draw- string waist, ankle ties (usually left untied and just tucked into Sorrels (or gaiters when the snow is deep))).